User talk:Caarrie

Splitting creatures and categories

What do you think of the categorization that I set up with the first few articles? Category:Creature --Daevaorn 13:34, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Expanding the players' guide

You mentioned that there are additions on crafting planned for the players' guide. Are there concrete proposals yet? I'd like to start a section on that with basic metal working described. Would that be ok or is there someone else working on that elsewhere? --Daevaorn 08:54, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Speedy deletion and cat

There are few pages that I think can also be deleted:

*[[Talk:Players Policy]]
*[[Talk:Implemented Skills]]
*[[Talk:Stonebreaker_Language/Grammar/Adjectives]]
*[[Talk:Images]]

Another proposal: How about setting up a category to collect deletion-requests by a template. In Wikipedia they call that "request for speedy deletion". You put a template on the page saying "This page has been marked for deletion" (or similar) that template also automatically lists the requests in a category, let's say

[[:Category:SpeedyDeletion]]

. That way we can collect the requests until a sysop pops in and checks the category for work. --Daevaorn 09:28, 30 December 2007 (EST)

I created Template:Delete and Category:Marked for deletion for this purpose. --Daevaorn 08:45, 2 January 2008 (EST)

User:Tuxide/Sandbox

Can you please post the deleted contents on

[[User:Tuxide/Sandbox]]

onto my talk page? I don't remember what I was doing on there. Thanks, Tuxide 07:54, 4 January 2008 (EST)

Tutorial

20:19 (cur; last) . . Caarrie (Talk | contribs) (deleted "Tutorial": deleting unneeded redirected page)

Why do you think these redirects are unneeded? I think we should have back some of the other redirects aswell that were recently deleted. It is not the main purpose of a redirect to be used within other wiki articles. That's usually achieved by the alternative description syntax for links ([[Something|something else]]). They make it much easier to find an article, and they cost (as good as) nothing.

It would be especially useful for the article Tutorial Walk Through to have a shortcut that can be typed more easily by advisors ingame.

http://pswiki.xordan.com/index.php/Tutorial

is complicated enough, why would we want to force people to use

http://pswiki.xordan.com/index.php/Tutorial_Walk_Through 

instead? The longer version greatly increases the chance for unnecessary typos (lower case second and third word, forgetting to use underscore instead of blanks, ...)

I hope you take no offense, but I find your policy on that sector too restrictive. --Daevaorn 17:34, 6 January 2008 (EST)

I think *most* are not needed, but a simple search will turn up the same information, and most of the pages i deleted were due to the moving of the players guide as we had discussed. If you make me a list of pages you think should be returned along with reasons, I will consider restoring them.

--Caarrie 19:01, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Addition to MediaWiki:Monobook.css

#navbar
{  
	position:absolute; z-index:1; border:none; background:none;
	right:12px; top:.3em; float:right; margin:0.0em;
	padding:0.0em; line-height:1.5em; text-align:right; text-indent:0;
	font-size:85%; text-transform:none; white-space:normal;
}

That's what is needed to implement a navigation bar on a fixed position in the upper right as discussed on IRC. --Daevaorn 08:49, 7 January 2008 (EST)