Category talk:Geography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Right now, this is a subcategory of Yliakum. Shouldn't that be the other way around? | Right now, this is a subcategory of Yliakum. Shouldn't that be the other way around? | ||
It already contains an article about something which is not part of Yliakum; the Stone Labyrinths. | It already contains an article about something which is not part of Yliakum; the Stone Labyrinths. | ||
:Thought in this one direction that is absolutely right. But at the moment the [[:Category:Yliakum]] does not only contain geographical articles. If we do not consider the stone labyrinths a part of Yliakum then the solution isn't that simple as to exchange the parent and child category. --[[User:Daevaorn|Daevaorn]] 09:28, 10 January 2008 (EST) | :Thought in this one direction that is absolutely right. But at the moment the [[:Category:Yliakum]] does not only contain geographical articles. If we do not consider the stone labyrinths a part of Yliakum then the solution isn't that simple as to exchange the parent and child category. (In political geography there are examples where surroundings that actually do not directly belong to a country or region are nevertheless dealt with as if they were, since there is nothing else near-by that they can be attributed to. Take airspace or territorial waters.) --[[User:Daevaorn|Daevaorn]] 09:28, 10 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 10 January 2008
Yliakum
Right now, this is a subcategory of Yliakum. Shouldn't that be the other way around? It already contains an article about something which is not part of Yliakum; the Stone Labyrinths.
- Thought in this one direction that is absolutely right. But at the moment the Category:Yliakum does not only contain geographical articles. If we do not consider the stone labyrinths a part of Yliakum then the solution isn't that simple as to exchange the parent and child category. (In political geography there are examples where surroundings that actually do not directly belong to a country or region are nevertheless dealt with as if they were, since there is nothing else near-by that they can be attributed to. Take airspace or territorial waters.) --Daevaorn 09:28, 10 January 2008 (EST)