Talk:Creatures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
→Splitting it up: Proposal |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Brand new to the community so hope I'm not stepping on toes. This article seems wayyyyyyy long. Might it not be better to split it up into individual creatures and use categories or something to organize it? --[[User:Lacitpo|Lacitpo]] 02:34, 6 December 2007 (EST) | Brand new to the community so hope I'm not stepping on toes. This article seems wayyyyyyy long. Might it not be better to split it up into individual creatures and use categories or something to organize it? --[[User:Lacitpo|Lacitpo]] 02:34, 6 December 2007 (EST) | ||
:I completely agree. But I would also like to get an official ok, before I start working on such a thing. --[[User:Daevaorn|Daevaorn]] 13:39, 23 December 2007 (EST) | :I completely agree. But I would also like to get an official ok, before I start working on such a thing. --[[User:Daevaorn|Daevaorn]] 13:39, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ||
:I propose that we use a template like [[Template:Creature]] to get all the articles of one kind in a similar form and layout. That has the unbeatable advantage of making it possible to edit the layout of all creature articles at once and ex post, making also later categorization easy to handle. I set up the article about the [[Clacker]] as an example. --[[User:Daevaorn|Daevaorn]] 15:39, 23 December 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:39, 23 December 2007
Format
Take a look at the layout of "Rats" - maybe editors of this section should use this format as a template?
Some pictures would be a nice addon.
--Fellice 12:05, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
- Done.
Value/Trade
Some areas do not fit into the 3 sub-headings we have right now, others could do with another heading, maybe "Value" or "Trade" for things that can be obtained from each creature (hides, etc)? --jonmack 06:34, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
- I don't think such categories should be allowed since it would be considered as spoilers. Josellis 05:03, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Splitting it up
Brand new to the community so hope I'm not stepping on toes. This article seems wayyyyyyy long. Might it not be better to split it up into individual creatures and use categories or something to organize it? --Lacitpo 02:34, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- I completely agree. But I would also like to get an official ok, before I start working on such a thing. --Daevaorn 13:39, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- I propose that we use a template like Template:Creature to get all the articles of one kind in a similar form and layout. That has the unbeatable advantage of making it possible to edit the layout of all creature articles at once and ex post, making also later categorization easy to handle. I set up the article about the Clacker as an example. --Daevaorn 15:39, 23 December 2007 (EST)